leelastarsky: (Default)
leelastarsky ([personal profile] leelastarsky) wrote2005-03-09 01:01 pm
Entry tags:

covers and coughing

Sick. As. A. Dog. :~(

the only thing keeping me going is codral.

Neverthless, I am excited by the release of the book covers for HBP.



I saw the Mary GrandPre one first and have to say I think it's my favourite of her covers so far. Though I really liked what she did for OotP. Someone on my flist said that she really needs to go back and redo the 1st 4 because the last two were a distinct change in style from the first 4, and I agree with this to some extent.

Then I saw the adult cover and meh I hate photo covers, so it did nothing for me.

Then I saw the UK cover and WOW. Talk about dynamic compared to the US one! I really, really like this one. Harry looks terrified but determined and Dumbledore is 'kicking ass and taking names!'. The fire surrounding them is from Dumbldore's wand, I suspect in response to another Voldie confrontation and, from what I have read on my flist, I am not the only one thinking that Dumbledore will be biting the big one this time round. Hero's journey and all that.

I really, REALLY want to see the back covers now! Specially the UK one.
ext_40142: (Default)

[identity profile] leelastarsky.livejournal.com 2005-03-08 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't say I adore Mary GrandPre's style either, but then I'm very much a 'realist' in art (and fic). Her sort of naive style looked nice on the first few books, but IMO defined them as children's books. GoF particularly had Harry looking quite joyous, which wasn't really appropriate. :~P

I prefer the UK editions too, and am very glad we get that here. I'd really love to see some good scans of the Danish and Swedish covers. They look beautiful, but I've only ever found weeny scans online.

I really wish the UK editions had the publication quality that the US editions have: all the chapter headers and the internal text changes. I was completely gobsmacked (and insanely jealous!) when I got my hands on a copy of OotP. The US version is a work of art.

[identity profile] argyle-s.livejournal.com 2005-03-08 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I wish the US editions weren't "Americanized."

I've considered shelling out for the UK editions just so I could read JKR's stuff unmangled.

I'll agree that the internal art on the US editions is something though.
ext_40142: (WeasleyWarPath [dark velvet])

[identity profile] leelastarsky.livejournal.com 2005-03-08 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I wish the US editions weren't "Americanized."

You and me both! We get the UK version here in Australia, for which I am forever grateful, but I could not believe the changes when I first became aware of it. Right down to the title of the first book! *steams* And the changes really DO stick out. To me anyway.

This is one of my pet peeves so I'm going to step away now before I start ranting. :~P

[identity profile] argyle-s.livejournal.com 2005-03-09 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
You and me both.

Don't get me wrong, I understand why it was done. The books are marketed to children in the US, and a certain bit of Americanization was probably inevitable. I just wish the would produce an unmodified version for sale in the US as well.
ext_40142: (WeasleyWarPath [dark velvet])

[identity profile] leelastarsky.livejournal.com 2005-03-09 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
They're marketed to children here too, but our kids get to learn the British coloquialsms. :~)

[identity profile] myf.livejournal.com 2005-03-08 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, the Swedish covers are beautiful. I saw a big poster of an illustration of CoS in a bookshop in Sweden, with Dobby sort of perched on Harry's shoulder, and Harry looking completely pissed off. It was the first illustration that really said 'Harry' to me. Wish I could find it online, but no luck. Have you seen the one I mean?
ext_40142: (Weasleys)

[identity profile] leelastarsky.livejournal.com 2005-03-08 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
No I haven't! But I'd love to!